Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Thoughts on “Good for the Soul”


I think Good for the Soul and Bugman shared the several common messages.  One, things that seem insignificant and meaningless may actually be very important and significant.  Good can come out of terrible situations if we let it. We briefly discussed this idea in class.  It’s something J.R.R. Tolkien called the eucatastrophe, “the good catastrophe.”   Both stories describe eucastrophes, bad situations that good later came out of.  In Good for the Soul, the irresponsible Father Ledet causes an accident driving under the influence on his way to administer Annointing of the Sick for the dying Clyde Arceneaux(100). Father Clyde is clearly a human priest.  He embodies the fact that good and grace can come through even flawed persons who sometimes give into temptation.  Some other themes found in Good for the Soul include temptation and forgiveness.
 When Father Ledet finally arrives from the crash site, Clyde asks for the Sacrament of confession instead.  In a humorous scene, Clyde begins by confessing missing mass “damn near seven hundred and fifty times.”  Clyde then interrupts his confession by asking questions about the purpose of hell.  After discussing hell and punishment, he goes on to admit he has withheld on sin.  Father Ledet responds “Well, it’s now or never,” something he immediately regrets.  Clyde eventually confesses stealing Nelson’s car to prevent him from waking him and everyone up in the neighborhood.  He is most ashamed of this (102).  Father Ledet leaves giving Clyde a light penance and suggesting that if he’d like he could tell Nelson his crime if he’d like.
Father Ledet is ticketed for driving under the influence and loses his license (103).  He struggles to stay away from alcohol (105).  Clyde’s wife later confronts Father Ledet, bemoaning the fact that Clyde wants to return the stolen car to Nelson and revealing to everyone before he’s dead that he’s a thief.  Later in the confessional, she proposes to Fr. Ledet that he return the car late at night.  He is later guilt tripped by Mrs. Barrilleaux who he had hurt in the car crash to go through with the plan.  He decides to drink before he returned the car in order to build his “courage.”  As he tries to return the car, he is found out in a very public way, but he doesn’t reveal who had originally stolen the car.
In the end, the rejection and shame Fr. Ledet endures is made worth it, when he sees Clyde in Mass for the first time in fifteen years.

            In Good for the Soul the eucatastrophe is presented in a more humorous way.  The eucatastrophe in Bugman is much more serious.  Mrs. Malone is impregnated and abandoned by McCall.  She schedules an abortion (117).  Later, we find out she decides to keep the child (119).  The heartbreaking and stressful experience with McCall results in a son whom she loves and cares for.  Felix the Bugman acts as a means of grace although he is also flawed.  Though Felix is usually gently and easy going he has the capacity for evil and violence as can seen in his attack against the Scalsons (118).  If it had not been for Felix, Mrs. Malone would not have experienced her eucatastrophe.  Felix seems to recognize this in the end.

6 comments:

  1. I thought it was interesting in Bugman that the very action (attacking the Scalsons) that causes Mrs. Malone to be afraid of Felix is also the action which causes her to keep her child. It is as if his desperation to have a family of his own startles her into realizing that she is also desperate for someone to love unconditionally. It is the void in her life which cannot be filled with her constant shopping.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think your connection between these stories and the idea of the eucatastrophe is spot on. Both protagonists are severely flawed-on a humbling human level-and it is through these flaws, and the violent catastrophes they cause, that these characters evoke goodness within others. What's more, we see how good the protagonists are themselves-they do not hold any contempt or malice towards those who wronged them, but rather rejoice at the positive impact their own follies had on that individual's life.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I enjoyed our class discussion about the "terribly predictable" endings that Gautreaux wrote for his stories, and while I agree, I believe there is still a creative, Catholic element to be appreciated in both of them. Specifically, in "Good for the Soul" there is a resolution of both men - Clyde and Fr. Ledet being forgiven of their sins. I think this shows Gautreaux's Catholic understanding of the world through the lens of the Sacrament of Reconciliation. Not all Christian traditions have this Sacrament have this God-give grace, and it is included as a pinnacle moment in the conclusion of "Good for the Soul". At the end of the work, not only does Clyde feel that his sins are forgiven enough to enter into the church for Mass, but Fr. Ledet also feels a sense of forgiveness by knowing that through it all he still had the ability to positively impact one person in the parish - Clyde. That feeling experienced by Fr. Ledet undoubtedly comes from God's gracious forgiveness, as written and viewed by Gautreaux.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. When reading both of these stories, I found that I kept thinking back to our class discussion on hierarchy and the different types. In "Good for the Soul", the idea of the priest as a servant to the people of god is clearly expressed. It appears that abuse of power is an issue even among the church, as various members of the congregation guilt trip Fr. Ledet into returning the stolen vehicle. I too liked how you used the idea of the "eucatastrophe". Even though the means for obtaining forgiveness were not ideal, it was achieved, made evident when Clyde attends church. This is a miracle in itself seeing as Clyde was being given last rites only weeks (months?) before. Is this moment of grace related to both his spiritual and physical healing?

    ReplyDelete
  6. After reading more stories by Gautreaux, his simple stories are packed with Catholic meaning. I know we talked about these stories a few weeks ago, but I really think that he is a very creative Catholic writer. He is able to intertwine his stories with his background, which allows the reader to become more involved. In "Good for the Soul," it is the preist's simple, good nature that gets him in trouble. This is emphasized in his simple reaching out to Clyde to pull him back into the Church, even if Clyde is on his death bed. I really think that Gautreaux touches on a fundamental idea in Catholicism about simplicity that allows Clyde to come back to the Church, just like God does not need any drastic events for us to come back to the Church.

    ReplyDelete